










 |
WASH LINE - Summer 2000
By Peggy Harris, W.A.S.H. Board
Chair
Women and Men Against
Sexual Harassment and Other Abuses
www.tagnet.org/wash
EDITORIAL
By Peggy Harris
HOW WE RESPOND:
In an article titled "Sexuality: A River of Life or Death" by Ron M. Wisbey,
(former president of Columbia Union Conference) in Oregon Conference Family Life
Ministries newsletter, We Are Family March/April, 1994, he says: "I am concerned
about the growing number of members who have found themselves in trouble due to
inappropriate sexual activities. The cataclysmic results of these moral lapses have
affected all of us, but most importantly, those involved and their immediate families have
been devastated.".. "We cannot simply assign the subject of sexuality and sexual
identity to the closet of unspeakable topics. For too long we have
"politely" refused to talk about it honestly and openly. We have made it
uncomfortable and even impossible to talk about temptations and dangers. Because of
this attitude we have been blind to problems until it was too late to apply preventative
measures - all we have been able to do is mop up afterwards."
Most of the people who contact me regarding their desperation in trying to deal with
abuse in their family, are totally frustrated in trying to get local church leaders to
recognize and deal with the problem. Because of the lack of local conference
response, the problem doesn't just go away but festers and grows until the only resource
remaining is a lawsuit.
In this issue we will explore how this indifference might be changed.
Asking for Forgiveness: An Organizational Responsibility
By Lawrence G. Downing
Adventist Today May/June 2000
"The December 2, 1999, Adventist Review published a unique statement. North
American Division President Alfred C. McClure, in an article titled "An Expression of
Sorrow and Apology," addressed delegates of a Race Relations Summit. He spoke
first as president of the North American Division, next as a pastor and last as a friend.
'I have something else to say to you as your president,' he said, 'and I want to speak
specifically to my Afro-American brothers and sisters with whom I and all my Anglo
colleagues have assumed a special relationship because of that abominable scourge of
slavery. I want to say to you, I apologize, I am sorry.
'I am sorry for the way you've been treated by our church, almost from the time of its
birth. For example, here in Washington D.C., where we had the unique opportunity to
exercise leadership in race relations, to take a lead in desegregation, we ran away from
it. I don't know all the circumstances. But I want to say on behalf of your
church, I'm sorry. I don't know if any other president has said that publicly - it
doesn't matter. But I want to say it today.'
"McClure's eloquent and courageous statement establishes an ethical precedent for
church leaders. His statement stands as an example to the religious community and
demonstrates how organizational leadership can responsibly fulfill the command of
scripture to confess one's sin and seek forgiveness.
"Donald Shriver Jr., in a recent Christian Century article "Bridging the Abyss
of Revenge" (December 1, 1999, pp. 1169-1173), addresses an issue pertinent to
personal and organizational behavior. He points out that nations even more than
individuals resist admitting guilt. He might have added that religious organizations
and those who lead them suffer the same aversion to admitting the error of their ways.
"Forgiveness is a fundamental Christian doctrine. Bible Doctrines 101 drills
into the student's mind, "if we confess our sins he is faithful and just to forgive
us our sins," (1 John 1:9). The Only-Go-to-Church-on-Christmas-or-Easter person
can repeat the part of the Lord's Prayer that implores our Maker to forgive us our
trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us.
"When two people are at odds with one another or when one person has wronged another,
the church and its leaders implore the parties to forgive one another. It is the
honorable and the Christian thing to do. Is it not so that an organization or
institution and those who lead or represent it are under equal obligation as to seek
forgiveness for wrongs committed or harm don't? If religious leaders have violated
the trust members have placed in them, should not the leaders confess and seek
forgiveness? An explanation detailing steps to set right the wrong may follow, but
first is admission of wrong and a plea for forgiveness from those whose actions have
harmed the reputation and integrity of the organization they serve.
"The more common practice when a religious organization and its leaders have been
exposed in malfeasance is to issue denials or defer to the attorneys. Large sums of
money are spent to hire public relation firms and attorneys to keep the problem quiet,
controlled and out of the press. Were it not for persistent inquiry by reporters and
interested parties, few members would know when church officials have brought disrepute
and harm to the church and its members. Adventist church officials have embezzled
money, misappropriated church funds, and used their denominational offices for personal
benefit or gain.
"Denominational leaders and the corporate body of the Adventist church have been
subject to large financial judgments because laws were broken. Seldom have church
leaders acknowledged wrongs and sought forgiveness from the membership when the church has
been held responsible for misjudgments or wrongs committed. It is not my purpose to
suggest that we follow the lead of South Africa and establish a Truth and Reconciliation
Commission, although there may have been situations when this model would have helped
bring closure to incidents that have negatively affected large numbers within the church
body. Nor should every vile deed or nefarious act be publicized. It is
important to note, however, that scripture teaches that those who refuse to acknowledge
their guilt and admit to their mistakes are condemned. Organizations and
institutions are not exempt from this mandate. It is not acceptable for leaders to
hide behind corporate policy or organizational charters. The command to seek
forgiveness applies equally and fully to corporate entities, in particular, those who
advocate moral behavior and promote ethical values.
"Can we expect religious organizations and religious professionals to have such
candor? Perhaps not. There is much to lose when organizations, especially
religious ones, admit errors and seek forgiveness. Admission of guilt carries the
risk of loss of trust, and since trust is the coin of the religious realm, the loss of
confidence may translate into loss of income. However, integrity has a value of its
own. The potential loss of trust by the less thoughtful may be balanced by respect
for those institutions, officials, and spokespersons who dare admit frailty. It is
possible that those who previously tagged statements from PR departments irrelevant and
unreliable may change their tune.
"When an organization, especially a religious one, admits guilt and seeks
forgiveness, it says to the world that it holds itself to the same standards it expects
from its members. When it does not, the opposite is true; it claims exemption from
the standards that govern its members. This establishes a high-risk precedent.
"Organizational leaders who wring their hands over the decline in public morals do
well to consider the implications associated with denial of culpability, responsibility
and obligation when leadership is found to have engaged in inappropriate or illegal
activities. Organizations, especially those with a religious or moral base, have
opportunity to demonstrate what it means to act as responsible citizens when they are
found to have violated commonly accepted practices or standards. The leaders of
these organizations can boldly confess the sin and humbly seek forgiveness.
"When an organization, especially a religious one, acknowledges error, this admission
flies in the face of what appears to be SOP (Standard Operating Procedures): admit
nothing, deny everything, claim innocence, and if convicted, claim innocence anyway, it
was all a misunderstanding. Responses like these do not build trust.
Responsible men and women who lead organizations and institutions acknowledge wrong
when the actions of organizational leaders hurt people or violate trust. They ask
forgiveness from those who have been harmed and seek justice.
"This is the right thing to do. It is how an organization restores its credibility,
establishes its trustworthiness, and maintains its integrity. Religious
organizations and institutions are not exempt. Those who are leaders in these
organizations are called to take the lead in this moral endeavor. Alfred McClure has
shown the way. He has done his church proud!"
Larry Downing is senior pastor of the White Memorial Church in Los Angeles, California and
is an adjunct professor in the School of Business and Management at La Sierra University,
where he teaches Christian Ethics to MBA students.
W.A.S.H. applauds both the Adventist Review and Adventists Today for publishing excerpts
of Elder McClure's apology. We are also grateful that finally a church leader has
had the courage to make such a public statement. We watched with interest to see if
this attitude would carry over into the 2000 General Conference Session in Toronto.
To our knowledge it did not. This is what Ellen G. White envisioned for the
General Conference Session in 1888 and sadly did not happen then. (See A Story of
Treachery in the story section of this web site.) This is what our church has been
waiting for ever since. How long, oh Lord? If church leaders are serious about
rebuilding lost trust, this will happen. If our church is serious about the need for
the gift of the outpouring of the Holy Spirit, this will happen.
We must remember that we are the church. We can begin this on a local church level
in our church board meetings, elders meetings, etc. Seeking forgiveness for wrongs
at the local church level will certainly help individuals and churches bring restoration
and finally the renewal we have long been waiting for. Local church leaders will set
an example for church members to also participate. God is waiting. What are we
waiting for?
More Internet Safety:
There is a new section titled Internet Safety and we will be posting information and
articles there.
A Word to the Wise:
We have received several letters recently regarding clergy abuse. Unfortunately we
have been able to determine that one of the pastors is still employed as a pastor. A
good question to ask your local conference is: do they do background checks on any pastors
hired? If not why not? Our schools have to do this. Pastors should also
have a background check made to verify their safety not only with church members but also
with children. Pastors are supposed to have a background check by the hiring
conference.
Any conference that hires a pastor with a previous history of abuse takes the risk on
themselves if there any claims presented. There is no coverage through the church's
insurance policy!
This is why it is so very important to report abuse to a conference and follow up if there
is no action by going beyond the local conference. It is best to put the
complaint/report in writing sticking to just the allegation at hand. Try to keep it
to one page and if there is more information indicate that in the complaint. Keep
copies of anything sent.
Here are some steps that should be followed in making a complaint
of abuse:
1. Follow up a phone call to the local conference president with a
letter briefly outlining the complaint. Stick to facts (like you would have to do in
a court). List any supporting information sources.
2. If no response of action/investigation on the part of the local
conference keep going up (union, NAD and finally the North American Division Office of
Human Relations, Dr. Rosa Banks).
3. If still no resolution you may then want to talk to an attorney to
find out if you have a legal case to bring a lawsuit.
These are the procedures to follow through to bring a resolution to the problem of abuse
by professionals in the church.
It may help to outline the problem on paper then let it sit a bit and go over it again
until you feel it is clear. Try to write it clearly and simply with a cool head.
That is hard when one is so involved and feeling the anger and pain that abuse
causes. But it helps to clarify the complaint to those who will receive it.
Just as a child who has done wrong responds more positively to a calm but stern parent so
also do adults.
Don't give up. Other potential victims will be saved from abuse if you make a
report.
As laymembers who have a concern about preventing abuse we should be asking our local
conference about their hiring practices.
We have listed on this web site a help organization C.E.A.S.E. (Clergy and Educator Abuse
Survivors Empowered). Their web site is: www.advocateweb.com/cease.
Check it out.
Letters:
"Very nice site. Thank you for sending me a notice about it." L
"The only reason I happened to read yesterday what you had written was that I was
wiped out after counselling and relaxed by surfing the web - finding your encouraging
poems. Thank you again!" F
"Thank you! I was just reading it from the link you gave me in the e-mail
"other web sites" and when I exited it after enjoying all your poems and
statements found you have sent me this message! We must think alike! Also
today I got an e-mail from Dee Miller who writes advocacy articles and is from the
Southern Baptist church! Since I am now a member of the Baptist church I was tickled
to find someone who was dealing with these issues there! Thanks for the info.
I signed up for the CEASE newsletter.. Love and prayers," J
"I've briefly looked at your site and must congratulate you on your hard work.
I hope you have many "hits" to the site which will help spread your
ideas. I'm sure I'll pull it up from time to time. Success to you." B
|