| For people whose lives are guided by
the Bible, the reality of death is acknowledged as part
of the current human condition, affected by sin (Genesis
2:17; Romans 5; Hebrews 9:27). There is "a time to
be born, and a time to die" (Ecclesiastes 3:2). Although
eternal life is a gift that is granted to all who accept
salvation through Jesus Christ, faithful Christians await
the second coming of Jesus for complete realization of
their immortality (John 3:36; Romans 6:23; 1 Corinthians
15:51-54). While waiting for Jesus to come again, Christians
may be called upon to care for the dying and to face personally
their own death.
Pain and suffering afflict every human life. Physical,
mental, and emotional traumas are universal. However,
human suffering has no expiatory or meritorious value.
The Bible teaches that no amount or intensity of human
suffering can atone for sin. The suffering of Jesus Christ
alone is sufficient. Scripture calls Christians not to
despair in afflictions, urging them to learn obedience
(Hebrews 5:7-8), patience (James 1:2-4), and endurance
in tribulations (Romans 5:3). The Bible also testifies
to the overcoming power of Jesus Christ (John 16:33) and
teaches that ministry to human suffering is an important
Christian duty (Matthew 25:34-40). This was the example
and teaching of Jesus (Matthew 9:35; Luke 10:34-36), and
this is His will for us (Luke 10:37). Christians look
in anticipation to a new day when God will end suffering
forever (Revelation 21:4).
Developments in modern medicine have added to the complexity
of decisions about care for the dying. In times past,
little could be done to extend human life. But the power
of today's medicine to forestall death has generated difficult
moral and ethical questions. What constraints does Christian
faith place upon the use of such power? When should the
goal of postponing the moment of death give way to the
goal of alleviating pain at the end of life? Who may appropriately
make these decisions? What limits, if any, should Christian
love place on actions designed to end human suffering?
It has become common to discuss such questions under
the heading of euthanasia. Much confusion exists with
regard to this expression. The original and literal meaning
of this term was "good death." Now the term
is used in two significantly different ways. Often euthanasia
refers to "mercy killing," or intentionally
taking the life of a patient in order to avoid painful
dying or in order to alleviate burdens for a patient's
family or society. (This is so called active euthanasia.)
However, euthanasia is also used, inappropriately in the
Seventh-day Adventist view, to refer to the withholding
or withdrawal of medical interventions that artificially
extend human life, thus allowing a person to die naturally.
(This is so called passive euthanasia.) Seventh-day Adventists
believe that allowing a patient to die by foregoing medical
interventions that only prolong suffering and postpone
the moment of death is morally different from actions
that have as their primary intention the direct taking
of a life.
Seventh-day Adventists seek to address the ethical issues
at the end of life in ways that demonstrate their faith
in God as the Creator and Redeemer of life and that reveal
how God's grace has empowered them for acts of neighbor
love. Seventh-day Adventists affirm God's creation of
human life, a wonderful gift worthy of being protected
and sustained (Genesis 1-2). They also affirm God's wonderful
gift of redemption that provides eternal life for those
who believe (John 3:15; 17:3). Thus they support the use
of modern medicine to extend human life in this world.
However, this power should be used in compassionate ways
that reveal God's grace by minimizing suffering. Since
we have God's promise of eternal life in the earth made
new, Christians need not cling anxiously to the last vestiges
of life on this earth. Nor is it necessary to accept or
offer all possible medical treatments that merely prolong
the process of dying.
Because of their commitment to care for the whole person,
Seventh-day Adventists are concerned about the physical,
emotional, and spiritual care of the dying. To this end,
they offer the following biblically based principles:
- A person who is approaching the end of life, and is
capable of understanding, deserves to know the truth
about his or her condition, the treatment choices and
the possible outcomes. The truth should not be withheld
but shared with Christian love and with sensitivity
to the patient's personal and cultural circumstances
(Ephesians 4:15).
- God has given human beings freedom of choice and asks
them to use their freedom responsibly. Seventh-day Adventists
believe that this freedom extends to decisions about
medical care. After seeking divine guidance and considering
the interests of those affected by the decision (Romans
14:7) as well as medical advice, a person who is capable
of deciding should determine whether to accept or reject
life-extending medical interventions. Such persons should
not be forced to submit to medical treatment that they
find unacceptable.
- God's plan is for people to be nourished within a
family and a faith community. Decisions about human
life are best made within the context of healthy family
relationships after considering medical advice (Genesis
2:18; Mark 10:6-9; Exodus 20:12; Ephesians 5-6). When
a dying person is unable to give consent or express
preferences regarding medical intervention, such decisions
should be made by someone chosen by the dying person.
If no one has been chosen, someone close to the dying
person should make the determination. Except in extraordinary
circumstances, medical or legal professionals should
defer decisions about medical interventions for a dying
person to those closest to that individual. Wishes or
decisions of the individual are best made in writing
and should be in agreement with existing legal requirements.
- Christian love is practical and responsible (Romans
13:8-10; 1 Corinthians 13; James 1:27; 2:14-17). Such
love does not deny faith nor obligate us to offer or
to accept medical interventions whose burdens outweigh
the probable benefits. For example, when medical care
merely preserves bodily functions, without hope of returning
a patient to mental awareness, it is futile and may,
in good conscience, be withheld or withdrawn. Similarly,
life-extending medical treatments may be omitted or
stopped if they only add to the patient's suffering
or needlessly prolong the process of dying. Any action
taken should be in harmony with legal mandates.
- While Christian love may lead to the withholding or
withdrawing of medical interventions that only increase
suffering or prolong dying, Seventh-day Adventists do
not practice "mercy killing" or assist in
suicide (Genesis 9:5- 6; Exodus 20:13; 23:7). They are
opposed to active euthanasia, the intentional taking
of the life of a suffering or dying person.
- Christian compassion calls for the alleviation of
suffering (Matthew 25:34-40; Luke 10:29-37). In caring
for the dying, it is a Christian responsibility to relieve
pain and suffering, to the fullest extent possible,
not to include active euthanasia. When it is clear that
medical intervention will not cure a patient, the primary
goal of care should shift to relief from suffering.
- The biblical principle of justice prescribes that
added care be given the needs of those who are defenseless
and dependent (Psalm 82:3- 4; Proverbs 24:11-12; Isaiah
1:1-18; Micah 6:8; Luke 1:52-54). Because of their vulnerable
condition, special care should be taken to ensure that
dying persons are treated with respect for their dignity
and without unfair discrimination. Care for the dying
should be based on their spiritual and medical needs
and their expressed choices rather than on perceptions
of their social worthiness (James 2:1-9).
As Seventh-day Adventists seek to apply these principles,
they take hope and courage from the fact that God answers
the prayers of His children and is able to work miraculously
for their well-being (Psalm 103:1-5; James 5:13-16). Following
Jesus' example, they also pray to accept the will of God
in all things (Matthew 26:39). They are confident that
they can call on God's power to aid them in caring for
the physical and spiritual needs of suffering and dying
individuals. They know that the grace of God is sufficient
to enable them to endure adversity (Psalm 50:14-15). They
believe that eternal life for all who have faith in Jesus
is secure in the triumph of God's love.
This consensus statement was approved and voted by the
General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists Executive
Committee at the Annual Council session in Silver Spring,
Maryland, October 9, 1992. |